Discrimination is covered by the Equality Act 2010. It happens when you are treated less favourably than another person because of a ‘protected characteristic’.
Sometimes however, less favourable treatment can be justified and is not unlawful discrimination. Additionally, if your employer treats you unfairly for any other reason than a 'protected characteristic', this is not unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
Protected Characteristics:
Direct discrimination occurs when there is evidence that someone is overtly treated less favourably than another because of a 'protected characteristic'.
Indirect discrimination occurs when a rule, policy or procedure is applied which puts a person with a 'protected characteristic' at a disadvantage when compared with other groups/others not holding that 'protected characteristic'.
To establish indirect discrimination, it is also necessary to show that:
Associative discrimination occurs where an individual is discriminated against because they associate with an individual (or group) with a protected characteristic.
It may also arise where unjustified indirect discrimination impacts on those who, whilst not holding the protected characteristic, are also disadvantaged.
Indirect associative discrimination is where a neutral provision, criterion or practice is applied by the employer which puts people with a protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage, and puts another person (who does not possess the protected characteristic) at a disadvantage too.
Perceived discrimination involves treating someone less favourably because it’s perceived (or assumed) that they have a 'protected characteristic', whether they do or not.
Victimisation occurs when someone is subjected to a detriment because they’ve made or supported a complaint of discrimination, raised a grievance about discrimination or supported another in doing so.
A comparator isn't required for a claim of victimisation, as the question is whether the person raising the complaint of victimisation has been subjected to a detriment because of their complaint or support of another. The motive for the treatment is key factor
See our page on Victimisation for more details
'Failure to make reasonable adjustments' is a type of discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
It can happen when an employer does not make reasonable adjustments for someone who needs them.
Adjustments are changes, which are justifiable, supportable and practical, that an employer makes to remove or reduce a disadvantage related to someone's disability. Employers must make reasonable adjustments by law.
What is reasonable depends on each situation.
'Discrimination arising from disability' is a type of discrimination. It means discriminating because of something that results from a disability, not because of the disability itself. It does not need a comparison with how other people are treated.
Important: This will not apply if the person or organisation treating the individual unfavourably did not know, and could not reasonably have known, about the disability.
Occasionally, there can be 'objective justification' where an employer has a genuine need to make a decision that leads to lawful discrimination.
For example, something resulting from someone's disability might mean they cannot do a certain job even if reasonable adjustments are made.
Copyright © 2024 MyLegalCase-Employment.com - All Rights Reserved.
David Isaacs Solicitors trading as My Legal Case is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA no: 74123)
Powered by GoDaddy